I don't really see how it would get better, because all you're talking about is changing cosmetic features. MMR would still be used to determine brackets and/or your % ranking.
Rating can be a scary thing, but it's the only way that measures your progress in real time. It's a pretty good thing, people just care way too much about it (me included) and forget to have fun.
MMR is fine except it is impossible to match the top tail into games - it is almost by definition as the numbers of players tends to zero the higher the mmr.
however you match doesn't change that there aren't enough people to match at the top end. you need to change to scheduled matches imo.
MMR could be linked to more statistics than just throne. I mean how does a courier feed justify -/+25 for u? how does a 4v5 due to abandon justify -/+25? There are so many things, which u cannot influence, yet u will be judged based on those things. Its like u are the only one of five, who bought a ticket for the bus but have to pay as well if the other four are caught. It should be all these statistics gathered before the throne goes down, mb w an extra point for winning.
The problem is u can be retarded and win and u can be gut and lose. but u have to play a million games in order to show that u are not retarded.
thats why is a team game, all for one, one fro all.
Just think to make a sistem that count perfectly the points that u will get or lose based on ur feeding, warding farming kills ecc ecc.
Its just impossible. Coz there will be always a difference between the role u are playing in the game. SO it will start the kills stealing, maybe people could think a game is lost and this guy start not playing anymore to not risk the feed, buying mass wards placing it randomly to lose less points ecc ecc.
I think this system isnt that bad. Depends on 50% on who u get in team, thanks god we can still mute and dodge :)
current system is fine. is much harder to climb rankings than lol system. i would like to see a mmr percentage however. like x% of players are 2,5-3k, y% 3k-3,5k etc
@luxury smurf - yeah it would be nice to know what the actual mmr distribution is now.
the mmr system works perfectly for 99.9% of players - almost everyone has a win rate between 45-55%.
mmr system will be great when boosting and acc buyer will be punished.
I dont blame who wanna smurf coz they still have to play.
The distribution should be more or less the same for every "rank", probably a bigger mass of players between 2.5-4k.
and ofc very few around 7k and 1k, but dunno around 5.5k EuW i see the same players often, time schedule or whatever.
OT: We want ARDM in ranked!
at 2,5-3,5k i dont think ive seen the same person twice, so i guess most of the population is at this range.
however on party, ive seen stacks of 2 or 3 players few times.
I think it would be cool to just have a league system like best 1% is on gold, best 10% silver, best 30% bronze etc...
Hopefully that reborn part that covers what type of role you typically play comes into effect to at least get more balanced lineups.
Please sign in to post comments.
A bracket system like in SC2 and LoL, or a percentile system that simply states "You are in the top X% of the player base".