Behaviour score is increased by playing matches and not getting reported. The campaigns have a match id, so they are technically matches.
Yeah just like dark moon
This thread have a point actually
Your autism make you cant see it daddy
I had like 9k beh score before having my main account cursed with abandon chains
I didn't notice any difference, games were still a bunch of shitfest
My BS is 9952
means nothing, I had a toxic blood feed 2 games ago
I had around 9k beh score before having my main account cursed with abandon chains
I did not notice any difference, games were still a bunch of shitfest
I maintained 4.6k on this account with 50% win rate for hundreds of games. I go on a 4.4k smurf with extremely low behaviour score. Within only 15 games, that account became 4.1k.
My BS is 9952
means nothing, I had a toxic blood feed 2 games ago
How often do you meet such people though?
Point of this thread is to ask if siltbreaker affect bs point
NOT about if bs affect matchmaking or not (if you just take this thread literally, not see op personal opinion)
Can you guys stop being autist pls?
How often do you meet such people though?
9500 here
always
bs doesnt affect mm, but it reflects how toxic you are yourself, and if you are cancerous, ur games and ur teammates sure behave worse because of u.
How often do you meet such people though?
9500 here
always
bs doesnt affect mm, but it reflects how toxic you are yourself, and if you are cancerous, ur games and ur teammates sure behave worse because of u.
Toxic does not automatically equal low behaviour score though. People who get reported can be feeders, bad mannered, uncooperative, or bad at the game in general. Most people get reported because they are bad at the game not because they are consistent griefers. In the 4/5 of my games yesterday, every lane lost and fed. In 2 of the games, there was a dual middle. How often do I see a dual core middle on the enemy team? Never. How often do you get dual middle on your team?
i see one dual mid in 1k games in any team
thats the issue of mmr tho
i consider griefing/feeding to be represented by the word "toxic" as well; its not just about flaming, but the attitude one has.
I went 7k from 9k after abandon. Didn't see much difference.
Tell us if you improve your bs after your spaming campaign
also you always notice this kind of shit happening in ur team cz u just see all of it, but barely ever realize enemy team had the same kind of issues and u won because of it; its just not observable for u
Yea, maybe spam clitbreaker and let us know did your bh score change or not
i dont know what was the exact behavior score b4 that event started, otherwise would be interesting, cz im not sure whether it is affected by this kind of matches or nah
I think does not affect behaviour score. I wrote a script to spam matches and ran it for a few games without any increase. I will run the script some more later.
i see one dual mid in 1k games in any team
But they are not trolling. They are playing dual middle because they do not know better.
How about I lend you my 4.1k smurf for you to play a few games, and you can compare your teammates to your usual ones? Look for teammate quality. Do your other lanes lose and feed? Are they uncooperative? Do the supports gank and buy wards and detection without you asking? Anyone who wants to borrow my account and is not playing in SEA (it seems everyone in SEA is toxic) can do so. For reference, the behaviour score is 4.5k.
oh wonderful, the retardation about behavior score bitching is back
*grabs popcorn*
It is not as though you have anything to disprove the theory.
its not someone elses job to disprove a theory that can not support provided for itself
lf russels teeapot in google
ik quite a bunch of ppl i get matched with in solo q outside of it, and some of them have bs down to 1k and even lower, spending 30% of their time in lp. yet we meet in the same games.
ur teammates do not know better than dual mid cz, as u said, its a 4.1k acc.
Behavior score doesn't mean anything, I capped out at 10k. If behavior score does effect who you get matched up with, then you're not missing much.
it is not someone elses job to disprove a theory that cannot support provided for itself
I will offer more definite proof in the future. All I have currently is my experience, which is seems to support my theory. If Cookie has nothing to contribute, he should say nothing. If he thinks something is stupid, he should prove why, as you say.
I know quite a bunch of people i get matched with in solo q outside of it, and some of them have bs down to 1k and even lower, spending 30% of their time in lp. yet we meet in the same games.
It is because of your mmr. Only 1% of people have that mmr, so you just get thrown with anyone with similar mmr.
ur teammates do not know better than dual mid cz, as u said, it is a 4.1k acc.
Your server must be full of autist if they still think dual core middle is good at 4k. Probably a result of mmr inflation in Europe.
Behavior score does not mean anything, I capped out at 10k. If behavior score does effect who you get matched up with, then you are not missing much.
It probably depends on the server. If there are toxic people at high behaviour score for your server, the game is still decently balanced because both teams have toxic players.
"I am planning on spamming quick matches to increase my behaviour score. Does anyone know?" - no idea brother
Please sign in to post comments.
I am planning on spamming quick matches to increase my behaviour score. Does anyone know?