well i prefer 4k avg where i can carry tards over 5,5k avg where i get no core pos and lose instantly
LMAO
come play unranked with me again kitrak when u need a break, don't rage queue or you'll just play worse
btw what are ur queue times, are they like 5-6 min or 1-2 min
uh i think if ure the stonger stack u end up on dire, not sure though
http://www.dotabuff.com/players/125538203/scenarios?date=month&hero=&skill_bracket=&lobby_type=&game_mode=&duration=&metric=all
ive 90% on dire but only 68 on radiant
according to "kawaii socks" aka temirlan, it means if you 5 stack and have too many dire matches, it's because of abuse!!
Is that dire thing true? I've noticed I have more dire games and when I'm on dire I usually don't even get mid if I first pick and end up having to jungle.
@Blue orchid
You also need to consider that valve thinks 4.1*4 + 7 = 6 + 4.4*4 EleGiggle
You either play mid your entire life or que EUE/EUW which is much better and the ping isn't even that bad
Mostly in my ranked games the team with higher average mmr is on dire so idk could be true
I think getting more Dire games than Radiant is a kind of subtle forced 50%. In the last 6 months I've been on Dire 54% of the time.
But is it really harder to win on dire? I mean it gives you a disadvantage? How exactly dire is a worse side of the map?
Mid Dire is shittier than mid Radiant. One glaring example is how the mid Radiant ramp is closer to tower range but mid Dire ramp is further from tower.
dont worry, according to "kawaii socks" aka temirlan, dire is supposed to be a free win!
i always lose on dire and i get dire 3-4 times in a row before i finally get a radiant game
dire is imo fucking awful
the only benefit is you can pull/farm the large camp closest to safelane, and offlaners often fuck with that anyway
Please sign in to post comments.
havent had a game with a mmr average higher than 5000 in like 6 games whats going on